AVMA Passes Rabies Waivers
#1
Posted 26 March 2012 - 06:48 PM
"...AVMA recognizes some animals might require a waiver from rabies vaccination because the vaccination poses an unacceptably high risk to the health of the individual animal..."
Permission Granted to Cross-Post
Founder, Co-Trustee
THE RABIES CHALLENGE FUND
www.RabiesChallengeFund.org
#2
Posted 28 March 2012 - 01:11 PM
If the vet says it's good, why should "appropriate public health authorities" be able to have a different opinion? Hopefully it would not be an issue....but some places in this country, yeah, it would.
diane
#3
Posted 28 March 2012 - 05:19 PM
Diane, this policy is a guideline for vets across the country & there are some states which require a state official (Connecticut is one) to approve the waiver -- so this language incorporates circumstances that would fit differing state regulations/laws.Good news, and I realize this isn't all new stuff...but the part that says, "upon recommendation of a licensed veterinarian and with the concurrence of the appropriate public health authorities" is somewhat bothersome.
If the vet says it's good, why should "appropriate public health authorities" be able to have a different opinion? Hopefully it would not be an issue....but some places in this country, yeah, it would.
diane
The fact that the largest veterinary medical association in the country officially recognizes that there are health conditions in which rabies vaccination poses an unacceptable risk to the health of the animal is enormous!
Founder, Co-Trustee
THE RABIES CHALLENGE FUND
www.RabiesChallengeFund.org
#4
Posted 03 April 2012 - 02:07 PM
AVMA (American Veterinary Medical Association) EXECUTIVE BOARD PASSES ANNUAL RABIES VACCINATION WAIVER http://www.avma.org/...ation_Final.pdf
"...AVMA recognizes some animals might require a waiver from rabies vaccination because the vaccination poses an unacceptably high risk to the health of the individual animal..."
Permission Granted to Cross-Post
Thank-you Kris for your hard work on this. Having a dog that seizures after rabies, this is a big relief for me. My vet would give me a health risk waiver, but this is more "legal". Thank-you
#5
Posted 08 April 2012 - 08:18 AM
Why?
Because my state does NOT recognize titers. If there was an exposure, my dog would be considered unvaccinated despite the letter from my vet, despite the waiver from my county, and despite the titers...and my dog would be considered unvaccinated with all the legal ramifications of an exposure to/ from an unvaccinated dog.
Although the risk of my dog biting someone is pretty minimal, she has killed small animals in my suburban backyard and we do have raccons in this neighborhood. I just saw one yesterday...crossing the street in broad daylight. A dog at the county border was just diagnosed with rabies--the owner saw the dog carrying around a dead raccon. The whole family had to undergo rabies prophylaxis...and several years ago a rabid raccon wondered into a doctors fenced backyard (on my side of town) and exposed his three dogs who were fortunately vaccinated. Nonethless there was a quarrentine situation.
While these rabies waivers are a good thing, one needs to read the fine print and then make a judgement on the risk vs benefit. State/local law superceeds anything coming from the AVMA.
#6
Posted 08 April 2012 - 11:11 AM
#7
Posted 08 April 2012 - 03:14 PM

Dangerous Dreams Farm
#8
Posted 08 April 2012 - 04:20 PM
Actually, this is not quite correct. French challenge studies conducted by a research team led by Michel Aubert & published in 1992 demonstrated that dogs were immune to a rabies challenge 5 years after vaccination. Dr. Ronald Schult's serological studies proved that dogs have antibody titer counts at levels known to confer immunity to rabies 7 years after vaccination.Dr. Jean Dodds has already proven rabies immunity lasts at least 7 years.
Currently, the 5 & 7 year rabies challenge studies being financed by The Rabies Challenge Fund are 1/2 way through their 5th year. These are being conducted according to the USDA's Title 9 code for rabies vaccine licensing standard, upon which all state laws are based. If successful, then the scientific data will be available for states to extend their mandated booster intervals.
Founder, Co-Trustee
THE RABIES CHALLENGE FUND
www.RabiesChallengeFund.org
#9
Posted 08 April 2012 - 04:25 PM
I read that news story also, however, it was not mentioned if the dog had received 2 properly administered rabies vaccines in the primary series. That was an important omission, as the CDC reported that in a study of all confirmed rabies in dogs and cats in the United States during the course of hte study, there were no documented vaccine failures in animals that had received two vaccinations.Recently there was a confirmed case of a dog with rabies that had not been vaccinated for 5 (maybe 7?) years.
Rabies Prevention -- United States, 1991 Recommendations of the Immunization Practices Advisory Committee (ACIP), Center for Disease Control's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly March 22, 1991 / 40(RR03);1-19 http://www.cdc.gov/m...ml/00041987.htm "A fully vaccinated dog or cat is unlikely to become infected with rabies, although rare cases have been reported (48). In a nationwide study of rabies among dogs and cats in 1988, only one dog and two cats that were vaccinated contracted rabies (49). All three of these animals had received only single doses of vaccine; no documented vaccine failures occurred among dogs or cats that had received two vaccinations. "
Founder, Co-Trustee
THE RABIES CHALLENGE FUND
www.RabiesChallengeFund.org
#10
Posted 08 April 2012 - 07:32 PM
I am the first person to say that vaccines must not be abused, but they do play a vital role in the health of our dogs. We need to proceed with science rather than conjecture when deciding on protocols. I hope that the case of the previously vaccinated dog with rabies is being investigating to figure out what went wrong.

Dangerous Dreams Farm
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


