![]() ![]() |
Nov 5 2009, 09:55 AM
Post
#21
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Registered Users Posts: 510 Joined: 3-March 09 From: Kansas City, Mo Member No.: 9,850 |
Just as an aside: remember Susan Butcher who ran and won the Iditarod? The good ole boys made horrible fun of her because she treated her dogs well. The assumption was that if you are soft on your dogs they will not be tough enough. And boy did she prove them wrong. She was always good to her dogs and they paid her back by winning over and over.
I absolutely hate the abuse of these dogs. The only thing it proves is that the handler is out of control of his temper. |
|
|
|
Nov 5 2009, 10:00 AM
Post
#22
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Registered Users Posts: 510 Joined: 3-March 09 From: Kansas City, Mo Member No.: 9,850 |
Hello all I appreciate what Julie said, especially the bit about training abuse. This discussion is such an over-simplied generalization as to be laughable and I've stayed out of it up till now for that reason. My feeling is that there is a pervasive, sexist, predjudice against women in dog trialing that is even perpetuated by women. We have tremendously talented women handlers in this country who not only can and do run "hard" dogs, but "soft" dogs as well and beat all comers handily with either and make it look easy. But who do you see in the judge's/clinician's chair? More often than not, it's a reasonably attractive man with an "aw shucks" persona who may have an accent or a well-shaped cowboy hat and may or may not have the slightest idea what they're doing. Some don't even have real success on which to hang that well-shaped hat. Others have just some veiled perception of success that may be 20 years old and far beyond actual knowledge of the woman who hired him. Culture overseas has kept many women out of dogs, but international exchange and the likes of Anna Krueger, Karin Mattson, Julie Hill, and the Croppers are changing that slowly but steadily. We don't have that excuse over here and I think it has more to do with pettiness, jealousy and ego. Women have been evenly competing against men in the horse world forever, and it's never a question of who rides the harder horse. Talent is talent and it's the same with dogs. Whether man or woman, everybody has a preference for a particular type of dog, but real talent shows when you can be successful with anything. For me, it's not about a hard or soft dog, but how well I can train and handle a good dog. I was reading McCaig's Border Wars yesterday and he stated that in the early years of the trialing thing here in this country that women were " barely tolerated." That's kind of the way i remember it, too. Ethel Conrad was out there and there were a few other women but they seemed to be real characters and I don't know how well they did. And Liv in Scotland was really making a name for herself and was well respected, I think. Do you think that the judges still disciminate against women? Or are the women at least getting a fair shake there? |
|
|
|
Nov 5 2009, 10:05 AM
Post
#23
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Registered Users Posts: 490 Joined: 15-March 02 Member No.: 2,161 |
Just as an aside: remember Susan Butcher who ran and won the Iditarod? The good ole boys made horrible fun of her because she treated her dogs well. The assumption was that if you are soft on your dogs they will not be tough enough. And boy did she prove them wrong. She was always good to her dogs and they paid her back by winning over and over. I absolutely hate the abuse of these dogs. The only thing it proves is that the handler is out of control of his temper. LOL! You are dating yourself |
|
|
|
Nov 5 2009, 10:18 AM
Post
#24
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Registered Users Posts: 510 Joined: 3-March 09 From: Kansas City, Mo Member No.: 9,850 |
LOL! You are dating yourself Sigh! Pi was such a good dog. I really miss all those old guys. We had such a good time with them. Did you see where Ethel Conrad died this year? Boy, she had a good run. She must have been in her 90's. I think Susan Butcher died a couple of years ago of cancer. She died way too young. |
|
|
|
Nov 6 2009, 09:34 AM
Post
#25
|
|
![]() Junior Member Group: Registered Users Posts: 27 Joined: 1-May 09 Member No.: 10,067 |
It seems the lack of real work is the largest contributor for breed changes. In today's hobby world, most people have to create jobs for their dogs. Their flock is maintained on a small number of acres in fenced properties. The sheep could be managed just as easily with a grain bucket. Strong, determined dogs need consistently hard, continuous work to keep the edge off. Otherwise, they are a fist full of reins. Difficult stock in rough terrain weeds out weak dogs.
|
|
|
|
Nov 8 2009, 03:11 PM
Post
#26
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Registered Users Posts: 345 Joined: 20-December 03 From: Malin,Oregon Member No.: 3,500 |
I completely agree Jeanne.
Lana -------------------- Lana Rowley
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th November 2009 - 08:32 PM |