Jump to content
BC Boards

Evanger's Dog Food Recall


Recommended Posts

Evanger's Hunk of Beef products have been recalled due to contamination with Pentobarbitol, a drug that's used to euthanize pets..

 

Beef being voluntarily recalled were distributed to retail locations and sold online in the following States: Washington, California, Minnesota, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York, Massachusetts, Maryland, South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida, and were manufactured the week of June 6 – June 13, 2016.

(http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm539900.htm)

5 dogs have gotten sick and one of them has died. (http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2017/02/sedative-in-dog-food-evangers-issues-recall-after-dog-dies/#.WJXZM39d6TI)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the Heads Up. These announcements are always troubling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This whole deal is very weird, but I applaud Evangers for immediately stepping up and investigating. The pugs involved in this issue are local, and its weird that no other animal got sick from the same batch and sold at the same store. Evangers has tried to communicate with teh dog's owners who have not responded. I think its important to post what Evangers says as well.

 

https://evangersdogfood.com/news-events/pug-family-updates/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This whole deal is very weird, but I applaud Evangers for immediately stepping up and investigating. The pugs involved in this issue are local, and its weird that no other animal got sick from the same batch and sold at the same store. Evangers has tried to communicate with teh dog's owners who have not responded. I think its important to post what Evangers says as well.

 

https://evangersdogfood.com/news-events/pug-family-updates/

 

 

Very interesting .... So really, the only "proof" we have of contaminated food is a complaint from dog owners who have never communicated directly with Evangers? :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was very strange. I read about this a while back. The owner said she just gave each dog a little bit from the can. All the dogs got sick very quickly. And one died.

 

I suppose it is possible the someone contaminated only that one can. But there have been no other complaints and most of the food has been eaten by now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My dog food store owner, whom I trust implicitly, has not and will not carry Evanger's or any brand that might be co-processed with it, for several reasons that involve ethical issues. Period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My dog food store owner, whom I trust implicitly, has not and will not carry Evanger's or any brand that might be co-processed with it, for several reasons that involve ethical issues. Period.

Where is Evanger's processed and what brands are co-processed with it? This sounds like they do not have their own manufacturing plant?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Where is Evanger's processed and what brands are co-processed with it? This sounds like they do not have their own manufacturing plant?

 

A number of brands do not have their own plant. As for Evanger's, Whole Dog Journal lists it as "co-packed in Texas" (this was the listing from 2015, in the current issue) as are a couple of other brands (Nature's Select and Sport Dog Food - neither of which is identified as being packed at the same location so it can't be said that they are) in the listing. Of course, there are many other brands that might be co-packed at the same location.

 

 

So, the short answer is, I don't know which other brands are co-packed with Evanger's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The recommended euthanasia injection dose for a cow, if evenly distributed within the cow, is at the oral ld50 for dogs; however the amount of the injectable pentobarbital euthanasia drug needed to kill a cow is 110ml per 1000lbs of body weight. If a dog ate its body weight worth of tainted beef it would get the ld50 dose. A cow injected with that much pentobarbital would not be able to walk past a usda inspector to enter the kill room at a usda processing plant.

 

We have not yet heard everything about this incident.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently, there was enough of the drug to kill a pug. Since it was found in unopened cans both at the pug's home and at the store, it was in the food. Theory is one thing, what actually happens is often something else. I highly doubt that anyone would kill their own dog in order to get some dog food company in trouble. And how would they get the drug into unopened cans in the store? It seems ridiculous to me to be skeptical about this, especially as the company has been in trouble for years for bad practices of one kind or another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not saying the owner killed her own dog, I'm saying the food manufacturer blaming it on contaminated beef (euthanized cow) doesn't add up in terms of the necessary leathal dose of pentobarbital in the context of how much the owner said she fed her dogs.

 

Go read about how canned food is manufactured and then tell us how just a few cans from a large batch were contaminated (lack of other reported dead dogs suggests limited number of tainted cans).

 

Most of the available information does not support contaminated ingredients.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The information on tainted unopened cans comes from a blog post where the author is reporting information they said was relayed to them by the FDA testing lab when they were seeking additional information on this case.

 

For argument sake I am taking this information at face value

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still baffled by this whole thing. The toxocology report linked above says it found pentobarbitol "in the feed," but that is followed by the caveat, "If this sample came directly from a can." So was this test done on food from the can or from the feed found in the dog's stomach contents?

Nor can I find any definitive test results from any other cans. The FDA announcement speaks of pento in "one lot" of food, but Evanger's statement says that NO other cans have tested positive for pentobarbitol and no other households have weighed in with complains and no other dogs are known to have gotten sick.

The whole thing is just weird. One family of dogs gets sick but no others. Evanger's says the tests of unopened cans came up with nothing. And according to them, the only positive test is related to the dog that died. I'm not entirely clear if the "feed" tested was from the same can the dog ingested, or from the stomach of the dog itself. But it continues to seem as if there was only the one incident and possibly only one can. :(

Tragic and weird.

~ Gloria



Link to comment
Share on other sites

And now there is another brand's "Shreds of Beef" recalled due to the same thing? Supposedly? I really wonder what's going on. This does not sound like contamination at the plant unless *someone* is contaminating just one (or a very few) cans of food (and it's at the same plant). Or is something happening at the homes of the these dogs? This just does not make sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two recalls of canned food for pentobarbital contamination for two different companies owned by the same family with identical corporate headquarter addresses (and suspected shared manufacturing plant). The most recent recall is for food manufactured in 2015. Why would the companies suspect contamination of a lot made in 2015 when the first recall is for food produced in June 2016?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And now there is another brand's "Shreds of Beef" recalled due to the same thing?

 

What brand is that? I did a search and can't find anything with that name.

 

I did look on Dog Food Advisor's recall page and see that Against the Grain Pulled Beef with Gravy Dinner for Dogs was recalled "because it may be contaminated with pentobarbital. (http://www.dogfoodadvisor.com/dog-food-recall/against-the-grain-dog-food-recall/).

 

This company is owned by children of Evanger's owners and the recalled food came from the same suppliers, though none that was tested was contaminated according to the Chicago Tribune. (http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-pet-food-recall-0216-biz-20170215-story.html)

 

ETA: There have been 3 other recalls of canned dog food according to Dog Food Advisor since the Evanger's recall, but those were all for possible metal contamination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...