Jump to content


Photo

Heads up Savannah


  • Please log in to reply
67 replies to this topic

#1 jbridges

jbridges

    Member

  • Registered Users
  • 32 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hall County GA
  • Interests:Dogs. Hotrod cars. GMC motorhomes

Posted 07 June 2017 - 12:11 PM

Shared with permission.  Only Chatham county, but County Commissions see this as a means to money, and don't much care about the cnsequences of bad legislation.  Currently, if you breed a Border Collie in Chatham County, GA, you must pay $250 the first time and $1000 the second.  And you must spay or neuter the litter when appropriate and the parents immediately.  Fairly long read, but essential:

 

CHATHAM COUNTY GA Breeders PLEASE read. Other breeders need to read also!!!!
Follow up on Chatham County GA Animal Services new ordinances as I have understood them today. Sorry it is long but needs to be read. I will update as I get further information.
On May 12, 2017, there was an amended ordinance passed that states the following (ordinance 22-202 (you will find it at the very bottom)). Goes into effect JULY 1, 2017.
"Breeders of AKC, or similar registries as listed on the official website of Animal Services, registered animals must possess a business permit and comply with all state regulations. Any dog born that is not registered must be spayed or neutered as soon as medically possible as well as both parents, if possible. Any breeder of such animal who does not have AKC registration but has intentionally bred will pay a super breeder fee of $250.00 for failure to comply. Upon second conviction, the super breeder fee shall be $1000.00."
When I spoke to Animal Services this morning I was told that if the dog was not AKC registered that they would fall under this ordinance. NO OTHER REGISTRIES, at this time, are recognized. Also, that they might possibly in the future, allow further registries like the Border Collie registry to be allowed. I was told that no mixes would be allowed to be bred. I have also obtained a copy of one letter that was sent out by Animal Services and given to several breeders over the weekend that states no puppies can be sold after July 1st of 2017 that are not AKC registered. If you sell a puppy or dog that is not AKC registered you will become a SUPER BREEDER and fined accordingly.
This may only be affecting Chatham County, at this time, but where will be next? It could possibly be used as a model for other counties. I myself do not see how this can be legal to start with but also find it very discriminating to all other registries and for sure some breeds that are not AKC registered. What other species could this lead to in the future.
Please send me a PM if you are interested in fighting this. I do know of one registry that has already been contacted about the ordinance change and waiting to hear what their plans on how to fight this. We need numbers to make ourselves heard and hopeful have this overturned quickly.



#2 geonni banner

geonni banner

    blabbermouth

  • Registered Users
  • 3,724 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Pt. Richmond, CA, USA
  • Interests:Photography, dog training, samurai movies, anime, illustration

Posted 08 June 2017 - 11:58 AM

"...When I spoke to Animal Services this morning I was told that if the dog was not AKC registered that they would fall under this ordinance. NO OTHER REGISTRIES, at this time, are recognized."

 

This is especially worrisome to me.  The worst registry is made to seem like the reputable, authoritative one.  <_<



What would Rainbow Dash do?


My blog is atpeacewithpink dot blogspot dot com


With%2Bthe%2BBarbados.jpg


#3 Sue R

Sue R

    Bark less, wag more

  • Registered Users
  • 12,731 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Bruceton Mills WV
  • Interests:Stockdogs, horses, chocolate

Posted 08 June 2017 - 12:12 PM

This is so troubling on multiple fronts, not the least of which is to select one provider of registrations (AKC) with the exclusion of every other provider of registrations, no matter how valid (or invalid) any individual provider might be. It is giving an arbitrary, unfounded, monopoly to that single provider. 


Sue Rayburn - Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult, but not the brightest firefly in the jar.

Celt, Megan, and Dan

"When the chips are down, watch where you step."

"The happiest people don't necessarily have the best of everything. They just make the best of everything." - author unknown

#4 jbridges

jbridges

    Member

  • Registered Users
  • 32 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hall County GA
  • Interests:Dogs. Hotrod cars. GMC motorhomes

Posted 08 June 2017 - 12:21 PM

Realize, the AKC had nothing to do with their selection - it's the only Registry they'd heard of.  Legislative Liasons wasn't aware of this until after it had passed - the would have helped fight it had they known.

 

The basic point being, lousy legislation is now usually coming at the County level.  Sticking our collective heads in the sand because we don't like this or that group helps no one.  The NAIA and AKC are currently the people most versed and best able to help fight this sort of foolishness.  You need to join them in the fight, not nedessarily in the peace.



#5 Sue R

Sue R

    Bark less, wag more

  • Registered Users
  • 12,731 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Bruceton Mills WV
  • Interests:Stockdogs, horses, chocolate

Posted 08 June 2017 - 02:54 PM

I am not blaming AKC, just pointing out that to select one entity and exclude all others, is not right. Yet, you are surely right in that AKC, with its name recognition, would be the default anyone who didn't know better or was ignorant of alternatives/options would choose.
Sue Rayburn - Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult, but not the brightest firefly in the jar.

Celt, Megan, and Dan

"When the chips are down, watch where you step."

"The happiest people don't necessarily have the best of everything. They just make the best of everything." - author unknown

#6 Journey

Journey

    Happiness is not having what you want but wanting what you have.

  • Registered Users
  • 2,645 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 08 June 2017 - 03:22 PM

Jbridges, did you speak to AC or was that post copied? I have several friends in Chatham county and they were not told ACK only when they inquired. However, looking at AC website I cannot locate the list of acceptable registries anywhere..
Karen & the growing pack of spoiled mutts!
Posted Image

#7 Tommy Coyote

Tommy Coyote

    Senior Member

  • Registered Users
  • 2,797 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Kansas City, Mo

Posted 08 June 2017 - 04:28 PM

No worries here in Missouri. Too much money coming into too many people who are in the dog business.

#8 Debbie Meier

Debbie Meier

    Senior Member

  • Registered Users
  • 2,628 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Alden, Iowa
  • Interests:Pretty much all stockdogs...for now

Posted 08 June 2017 - 05:36 PM

None listed would default to AKC only until a list is generated including others.

 

Have to file for a business permit in order to breed, they can approve or decline your registry at that time also.  


Posted Image


http://leaningtreebcs.blogspot.com/

"Every poor one you continue to work with equates to a good one that you never get the opportunity to own"- M. Christopher

#9 Journey

Journey

    Happiness is not having what you want but wanting what you have.

  • Registered Users
  • 2,645 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 08 June 2017 - 06:49 PM

Spoke to them this afternoon, one of them is a vet and specifically brought this matter up, was told no, it did t apply to legit registries, but yeah, the page is blank and no one can answer the question. Sad and ironic, ABCA has a base in GA.
Karen & the growing pack of spoiled mutts!
Posted Image

#10 jbridges

jbridges

    Member

  • Registered Users
  • 32 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hall County GA
  • Interests:Dogs. Hotrod cars. GMC motorhomes

Posted 12 June 2017 - 03:05 PM

Worse than sad and ironic - believe that the AR folks are in there pitching "The ABCA supports CRUELTY TO ANIMALS>  THEY SIC THEIR DOGS ON DEFENSELESS SHEEP!!!"  County commissioners, with very few exceptions, will grease the squeakiest wheel, they have no personal interest in most issues.  The ABCA needs to be on these folks (the Commissioners) like white on rice to put it politely.  Or otherwise, they won't be recognized and your options will be breed AKC or be illegal, as far as Borders in Chatham County are concerned.  And realize, this will be the model for every county in turn if it isn't squelched.  Put the feud aside and fight the common enemy.

 

--johnny



#11 D'Elle

D'Elle

    Senior Member

  • Registered Users
  • 2,169 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Tucson AZ

Posted 12 June 2017 - 05:57 PM

what feud?


D'Elle

and family.

Left to right: Kit, Jester, Boo, Digger

 

 

Mydogs12-2013Smaller.jpg
"You gonna throw that?" --Jester:  2001 - June 24 2016. Remembered with much love.
"I'm grouchier than you are" --Kit

"I love everyone!" -- Boo

(Boing! Boing! Boing!)--Digger

And not pictured, Benjamin the cat, who thinks he is a small border collie with superpowers.

 

 

 


#12 Journey

Journey

    Happiness is not having what you want but wanting what you have.

  • Registered Users
  • 2,645 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 12 June 2017 - 08:34 PM

AKC vs ABCA D'Elle..
Karen & the growing pack of spoiled mutts!
Posted Image

#13 Liz P

Liz P

    optimistic realist

  • Registered Users
  • 5,216 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:somewhere inside my brain

Posted 12 June 2017 - 09:39 PM

Missouri has actually passed some fairly strict breeding laws.  However, people have to get caught for them to be enforced.  You aren't supposed to have more than 3 intact bitches, whether or not you are breeding them, without a kennel license.



#14 D'Elle

D'Elle

    Senior Member

  • Registered Users
  • 2,169 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Tucson AZ

Posted 14 June 2017 - 08:35 AM

AKC vs ABCA D'Elle..

Well, I figured that was what was being referred to. But it's not by any definition a feud. 


D'Elle

and family.

Left to right: Kit, Jester, Boo, Digger

 

 

Mydogs12-2013Smaller.jpg
"You gonna throw that?" --Jester:  2001 - June 24 2016. Remembered with much love.
"I'm grouchier than you are" --Kit

"I love everyone!" -- Boo

(Boing! Boing! Boing!)--Digger

And not pictured, Benjamin the cat, who thinks he is a small border collie with superpowers.

 

 

 


#15 jbridges

jbridges

    Member

  • Registered Users
  • 32 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hall County GA
  • Interests:Dogs. Hotrod cars. GMC motorhomes

Posted 15 June 2017 - 11:52 AM

Call it as you will, 'disagreement' is fine.  Again the point is, co-operation against laws being pushed by AR activists will work better than hand - wringing while all the dogs lose.



#16 GentleLake

GentleLake

    Senior Member

  • Registered Users
  • 5,372 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 15 June 2017 - 03:17 PM

... it's not by any definition a feud. 

 

Some of us who were around during the Dog Wars in the '80s might remember it a little differently.  :lol:

 

Just ask Donald. He was right on the front lines.


“I think dogs are the most amazing creatures; they give unconditional love. For me, they are the role model for being alive.” - Gilda Radner


#17 Smalahundur

Smalahundur

    Senior Member

  • Registered Users
  • 1,771 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Iceland

Posted 16 June 2017 - 07:12 AM

I don't think "war" is the proper term for that conflict either.
"Frontlines" made me chuckle too. Tell me how many shots were fired in anger? :)

"Milli manns og hests og hunds hangir leyniþráður"


#18 Sue R

Sue R

    Bark less, wag more

  • Registered Users
  • 12,731 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Bruceton Mills WV
  • Interests:Stockdogs, horses, chocolate

Posted 16 June 2017 - 09:17 AM

It was a conflict, and is known in US working Border Collie culture as "The Dog Wars", which is also the name of Don McCaig's excellent book about the efforts of the useful working dog supporters to keep the Border Collie from being assimilated by the AKC, where its worth would be measured primarily by criteria that have nothing to do with the work. I say "primarily" because AKC and BCSA do put on events that are essentially watered-down trials where dogs can earn titles in "herding". So there is some lip service but work really takes a back seat to the show and sport venues.
Sue Rayburn - Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult, but not the brightest firefly in the jar.

Celt, Megan, and Dan

"When the chips are down, watch where you step."

"The happiest people don't necessarily have the best of everything. They just make the best of everything." - author unknown

#19 waffles

waffles

    Senior Member

  • Registered Users
  • 1,067 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:NY

Posted 16 June 2017 - 09:21 AM

I was confused by this thread and interested so I did a little reading.  This was not passed without public input and public hearings. This thread makes it sound like it was, and that it was passed in cahoots with the AKC and is specifically about border collies/ABCA.

 

What this seems to be about is controlling the population of strays and surrenders in local shelters.  What is the euthanasia rate in your municipal shelters or SPCA (whatever you have down there in your area)?  It seems the county was trying to create more responsible breeding and dog ownership to cut down on the costs and numbers of dogs that cycle into shelters/are euthanized.  I live in NY and private rescues as well as our local SPCA are always transporting dogs from the south to save them.  They post about van loads and semi-tractor's full of dogs coming up from southern states.  The news does 'heartwarming' stories on it.  People eat it up and dogs are immediately adopted out.

It seems your county is trying its best (though I agree misguided by only including AKC dogs initially) to help the problem.  Most people only know of the AKC for a dog registry, but it seems they are learning and are going to be including more registries (according to the animal services website anyways).

 

I also see no evidence, at least that I can find online, that this law was proposed originally by animal rights activists.  Do you know otherwise?  Curious because a law like this would probably never pass in my area.  We have a mill 15 min. from me with 2 giant buildings and 400 on site at any time (according to their inspections).  I think breeders would really unite if the county tried to pass a similar law.

 

I found this article from April:

http://savannahnow.com/news/2017-04-20/commission-tackles-revisions-chatham-county-animal-control-ordinance 



#20 GentleLake

GentleLake

    Senior Member

  • Registered Users
  • 5,372 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 16 June 2017 - 10:15 AM

I say "primarily" because AKC and BCSA do put on events that are essentially watered-down trials where dogs can earn titles in "herding".

 

At the time they didn't even have that. The only thing ACK did at the time was conformation and obedience competition.

 

Actually, there's nothing inappropriate about the use of the word "war" to describe a conflict that's not military. From the Mirriam-Webster site:

 

a :  a state of hostility, conflict, or antagonism

b :  a struggle or competition between opposing forces or for a particular end a class war a war against disease

c :  variance, odds

(https://www.merriam-.../dictionary/war)

 

There was most definitely conflict and struggle between the opposing factions and we were most decidedly at odds. ;)


“I think dogs are the most amazing creatures; they give unconditional love. For me, they are the role model for being alive.” - Gilda Radner



1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


    Yahoo (1)
Copyright: All posts and images on this site are protected by copyright, and may not be reproduced or distributed in any way without permission. Banner photo courtesy of Denise Wall, 2009 CDWall. For further information, contact info@bordercollie.org.